Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- performance_comparison [2012/01/23 14:20]
britaldo
+++ performance_comparison [2012/01/23 17:07]
britaldo
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ==== Results ====
-Figures below show the pathways calculated with three passes and another with optimum solution using Dinamica EGO as well as the pathways output from MacroModeler and ModelBuilder. Table below show the performance figures for the three platforms. To run the tests, we used a laptop VAIO Intel i5 CPU with 8 GB of RAM, solid state disk, and Windows Seven 64 bits. Dinamica version was 1.8, IDRISI version was **IDRISI 32, v.2** (to be compatible with the Taiga version, the model needs to be modified). ArcGis version was **ArcGis 9.3**.
+Figures below show the pathways calculated with three passes and another with optimum solution using Dinamica EGO as well as the pathways output from MacroModeler and ModelBuilder. Table below show the performance figures for the three platforms. To run the tests, we used a laptop VAIO Intel i5 CPU with 8 GB of RAM, solid state disk, and Windows Seven 64 bits. **Dinamica version was 1.8.**, IDRISI version was **IDRISI 32, v.2** (to run on the Taiga version, the model needs to be modified). ArcGis version was **ArcGis 9.3**.
 {{:ego3_optimum1.png?nolink&300|Results produced by Dinamica EGO}} {{:ego3_optimum_idrisi_arcgis.png?nolink&300|Comparison of results produced by all softwares}}
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 | Dinamica EGO using 3 passes  |  5 sec  |  46 sec  |
 | Dinamica EGO using optimum solution  |  38 sec  |  6 min 6 sec  |
-| Idrisi MacroModeler  |  10 min  |  crashed  |
+| Idrisi MacroModeler  |  10 min  |  did not finish  |
-| ArcGIS ModelBuilder  |  22 min  |  crashed  |
+| ArcGIS ModelBuilder  |  22 min  |  did not finish   |